The US SEC has sued Paxos, the issuer of BUSD, a stablecoin pegged to the US dollar, labeling it an “unregistered security.” The SEC alleges that Paxos raised funds through the sale of BUSD without registering it or seeking an exemption, and made false and misleading statements regarding the nature and safety of the coin. Paxos has rejected the allegations and says BUSD is not a security. The case could set a precedent for the future regulation of crypto.
SEC Takes Legal Action Against Paxos Over BUSD
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has taken legal action against Paxos, the issuer of BUSD, a stablecoin pegged to the U.S. dollar. The SEC has labeled BUSD as an “unregistered security,” and is seeking injunctive relief, disgorgement, and civil penalties.
The move marks the latest development in the ongoing regulatory scrutiny of stablecoins, which have become increasingly popular in recent years as a means of facilitating payments and trading in the crypto space. BUSD, in particular, has emerged as one of the largest and most widely used stablecoins, with a market capitalization of over $1 billion.
Stay upto date with all the latest cryptocurrency news and events.
According to the SEC, BUSD is an “investment contract” that constitutes a security under federal securities laws. The agency argues that Paxos has been offering and selling BUSD to the public without registering it as a security or seeking an exemption from registration.
In a statement, the SEC said that “Paxos raised funds through the sale of BUSD, which it claims are pegged to the U.S. dollar, by offering and selling securities to the public without registering the offering or seeking an exemption.”
The SEC’s complaint also alleges that Paxos made false and misleading statements in its marketing and promotional materials regarding the nature and safety of BUSD, as well as its regulatory compliance.
Paxos, for its part, has rejected the SEC’s allegations, stating that BUSD is not a security and that it has taken extensive measures to ensure compliance with all applicable regulations.
“We disagree with the SEC’s position and are disappointed that it chose to bring this action,” said Paxos CEO Charles Cascarilla in a statement. “Paxos has always been committed to regulatory compliance and we believe BUSD is not a security. We will defend ourselves vigorously.”
The legal action against Paxos and BUSD is likely to raise concerns among those in the crypto community who see it as yet another attempt by the SEC to clamp down on the growing sector. The SEC has been increasingly active in recent months in pursuing enforcement actions against companies that it deems to be in violation of federal securities laws, particularly in the context of initial coin offerings (ICOs) and other crypto offerings.
However, the SEC’s action against Paxos and BUSD is notable in that it targets a well-established and well-regarded company in the crypto space, and one that has sought to work closely with regulators and comply with all applicable laws.
The case also highlights the ongoing debate over the proper classification and regulation of stablecoins. While some have argued that stablecoins should be classified as securities, others have argued that they should be treated as commodities or currencies.
The SEC’s action against Paxos and BUSD is likely to have far-reaching implications for the stablecoin market, as it could set a precedent for how regulators view and treat stablecoins in the future.
As the case moves forward, it will be important to closely monitor the arguments and evidence presented by both sides, and to consider the broader implications for the crypto sector and the future of stablecoins.
In the meantime, it is worth noting that the SEC’s action against Paxos and BUSD is just one of many regulatory challenges that the crypto sector is likely to face in the coming years. As the sector continues to grow and mature, it will be important for companies to remain vigilant and proactive in their efforts to comply with all applicable laws and regulations, and to engage with regulators in a constructive and collaborative manner.